Search

English / Politics & Diplomacy

AI Adoption in Southeast Asia: Who Leads, Who Lags?

AI Adoption in Southeast Asia: Who Leads, Who Lags?
AI Adoption in Southeast Asia | Unsplash

Across Southeast Asia, artificial intelligence is being absorbed not as a uniform wave, but as a fragmented surge. From Singapore’s algorithmic precision to Indonesia’s bottom-up experimentation, every country in ASEAN is interpreting AI through the lens of its own priorities—be it economic modernization, cultural preservation, or political control.

AI is already writing emails, policing borders, predicting harvests, and helping small businesses restock their shelves. Yet behind the buzzwords, the reality is much more nuanced. While some nations are accelerating with full institutional support, others are grappling with uneven infrastructure, limited access, and the absence of cohesive national strategies.

This uneven adoption paints a telling picture of the region’s digital future. It compels a deeper question: who’s leading Southeast Asia’s AI movement—and who risks falling behind?

Singapore: Far Ahead, but Facing Plateau?

There’s no disputing Singapore’s position as the undisputed AI frontrunner in the region. With one of the most comprehensive national AI strategies in the world, Singapore consistently ranks among the top 25 countries globally for AI readiness. It also attracts more than 75% of all AI venture capital funding flowing into Southeast Asia, a clear sign of investor confidence and policy clarity.

Artificial intelligence in Singapore isn’t just a tech sector—it’s part of the country's governance DNA. From banking and healthcare to public housing and immigration control, AI is deeply embedded into daily systems. Flagship institutions like DBS Bank have deployed over 350 AI use cases, while the government's AI Governance Framework has been recognized globally for its proactive stance on ethics, fairness, and transparency.

Public usage is high, too. According to a 2024 Deloitte survey, 67% of Singaporean employees and an impressive 86% of students have already used generative AI. But Singapore’s challenge now isn’t merely about scaling adoption. It’s about avoiding stagnation in maturity. As other nations begin to experiment boldly, Singapore must find new ways to innovate and remain ahead—not just in regulation and infrastructure, but in imagination.

Indonesia & Vietnam: The Unexpected Leaders in Adoption

Surprisingly, the countries with the highest AI adoption rates in the region aren’t Singapore, but Indonesia and Vietnam—both hovering at around 42%. This finding flips the usual narrative and highlights how adoption isn’t only a product of wealth or policy, but also of necessity and user behavior.

Indonesia’s AI growth story is being shaped by its scale and optimism. With a population of over 270 million and a tech-savvy middle class, AI is seeping into sectors like logistics, agriculture, digital commerce, and even language preservation. A bold US$1.7 billion investment from Microsoft is currently transforming the nation's digital backbone, and by 2025, the program aims to train more than 840,000 Indonesians in cloud and AI technologies. In a uniquely local twist, Indonesia is also leading in linguistic AI. Researchers and institutions are developing NLP tools tailored to over 700 regional languages, ensuring that AI reaches and reflects the country’s incredible linguistic diversity.

In Vietnam, AI is being applied with sharp pragmatism. The technology is deeply integrated into its fast-growing e-commerce ecosystem, helping sellers automate pricing, inventory, and customer service. Local businesses are quick to experiment, and students have emerged as one of Asia’s most active GenAI user groups. In many ways, Vietnam is showing how small-scale, high-frequency innovation can lead to widespread adoption—even in the absence of vast capital.

These two countries may not lead in global rankings or policy sophistication, but they are defining a different kind of leadership: one rooted in accessibility, bottom-up experimentation, and relevance to real-world challenges.

Thailand: Strong Policy, Moderate Adoption

Thailand has laid out ambitious plans for AI. With over 100 smart city projects either active or in development, and projections placing the national AI market at ฿114 billion by 2030, the country has clearly embraced AI as part of its urban and digital transformation vision. Government agencies are working with private firms to use AI in areas like traffic control, environmental monitoring, and public service delivery.

Public sentiment toward AI is also positive. Surveys show that around 77% of Thais believe artificial intelligence will do more good than harm—a rate among the highest in the region. However, these intentions haven’t yet translated into widespread adoption, particularly among small and medium enterprises (SMEs). Adoption rates hover around 39%, slightly behind Indonesia and Vietnam. Despite strong infrastructure and policy commitments, Thailand still faces hurdles in terms of technical expertise, industry readiness, and integration across sectors.

Malaysia: Investment-Heavy, but Still in Transition

Malaysia is betting big on AI, and the numbers show it. In 2025, Microsoft committed US$2.2 billion toward AI and cloud infrastructure development across the country, signaling growing global confidence in Malaysia’s digital ambitions. Penang is emerging as a regional semiconductor hub, with ambitions to become a critical link in the global AI hardware supply chain. At the policy level, Malaysia continues to roll out AI blueprints and innovation roadmaps aimed at catching up to regional leaders.

Yet despite the promise, AI adoption on the ground remains modest. Much of the infrastructure is either under development or still underutilized. The gap between enterprise needs and workforce readiness persists. There is a growing sense that while Malaysia has the talent, institutions, and funding, it still needs to build stronger bridges between theory and practice—especially for sectors outside the Klang Valley.

Philippines: Lagging, but With Strong Academic Anchors

The Philippines presents an intriguing paradox. On one hand, it boasts world-class academic talent and infrastructure, including Southeast Asia’s fastest AI-dedicated supercomputer located at the Analytics, Computing, and Complex Systems Laboratory (ACCeSs@AIM) in Makati. Filipino data scientists are gaining recognition in global competitions, and GenAI awareness is growing among professionals and educators.

However, these strengths have yet to translate into significant nationwide adoption. Practical AI usage in sectors such as governance, education, or health remains limited, in part due to uneven internet infrastructure and limited investment in localized digital tools. For now, the Philippines lags behind its neighbors—but if its research communities are better linked with real-world applications, and infrastructure gaps addressed, the country could still play a leading role in areas like AI for education and healthcare.

 Why the Gaps Exist

The unevenness of AI adoption in Southeast Asia isn’t just a matter of money or intent. A range of structural factors contributes to the divide. Infrastructure remains a major constraint. While urban centers are often well-connected, vast rural areas lack the bandwidth, power stability, or devices needed to meaningfully access AI tools. Digital literacy also plays a key role. In many countries, especially beyond capital cities, there is limited understanding of what AI can do—and how to use it safely or productively.

Another complicating factor is language. Many of the large AI models dominating the space are trained in English or Mandarin, limiting their cultural and linguistic relevance in a region where hundreds of languages and dialects are still actively used. Finally, public policy varies dramatically. Some governments, like Singapore and Thailand, have developed national AI strategies. Others are still experimenting or adjusting their regulatory frameworks to keep up with the pace of change.

As a result, AI isn’t spreading like wildfire across Southeast Asia—it’s moving in bursts and pockets, driven by local ingenuity, uneven investments, and diverse socio-political realities.

Looking Ahead: The Billion-Dollar Question

There’s no doubt about the economic promise of AI in the region. Various projections estimate that artificial intelligence could add up to US$1 trillion to Southeast Asia’s collective GDP by the end of this decade. But realizing that promise requires more than funding or cloud deals. It demands targeted action—especially in talent development and local application design.

Countries that invest in building locally relevant AI models, support inclusive innovation in rural and low-income areas, and embed ethics into their digital policies are more likely to lead. Those that rely only on foreign-built models or narrow enterprise use may find themselves locked out of long-term transformation.

AI in Southeast Asia is not a race in the traditional sense. It's more like a relay—each country carrying a different part of the baton.

Leadership in Layers

So, who’s leading the AI movement in Southeast Asia? The answer depends on what kind of leadership we’re talking about. Singapore still leads in terms of policy sophistication, capital concentration, and overall AI maturity. But Indonesia and Vietnam are showing the fastest rates of adoption at the population level. Malaysia is making huge strides in infrastructure investment, while Thailand is innovating through city-scale projects. The Philippines, meanwhile, has an underutilized but potentially powerful academic and research base.

Ultimately, Southeast Asia doesn’t need a single digital superpower. What it needs is a region of complementary strengths—where each country plays to its unique advantage, whether that's policy, people, infrastructure, or imagination. That, more than any AI model or algorithm, will shape the future of the region.

References

Tags: ai

Thank you for reading until here